![]() Multiple tests check that parsing, rendering, and compiling return expected results, formatting follows guidelines, and code coverage is at the expected level. Returns: 'My favorite kind of cake is: Chocolate!' Eta gives you more flexibility with delimeters - you could set them to ).Instead, Eta uses ~ to output a raw value Eta allows left whitespace control (with -), something that doesn't work in EJS because EJS uses - on the left side to indicate that the value shouldn't be escaped.Eta compiles and renders templates much faster than EJS.Eta weighs less than 2.5KB gzipped, while EJS is 4.4KB gzipped Here are the differences between Eta and EJS: □ 2.3KB minzipped size restricted to " %> compiles correctly, while it fails with doT or EJSĮta's syntax is very similar to EJS' (most templates should work with either engine), Eta has a similar API, and Eta and EJS share the same file-handling logic.Created by the developers of Squirrelly, it's written in TypeScript and emphasizes phenomenal performance, configurability, and low bundle size. Eta is a lightweight and blazing fast embedded JS templating engine that works inside Node, Deno, and the browser.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |